When you hear the names “Michael Vick,” “Marion Jones,” and “Floyd Landis,” what comes to mind? In 2006, you may have answered this question by saying “NFL’s ‘Superman’,” “the Olympic Gold Medalist,” and “the Tour de France Champion,” respectively. However, today, the answers might be “Dog Fighting,” “Steroids,” and “Doping.”
How quickly things change.
Is it me or do athlete behavior controversies seem to be appearing too regularly on newspaper front pages nationwide? And, no sport is immune. Every sport or team seems to have some crisis management team in high gear. These poor behavior incidents have run the gamut of consequences: from a slap on the wrist, to multi-game suspensions, to season-long suspensions, to forced retirements, and even criminal prosecutions.
As someone who works in and loves the sports industry, I’ve asked myself, “What’s going on here and what on earth can we do about it?”
Well, it starts with the relationship between athletes and fans, both young and old. To kids, athletes are role models and professionals to look up to. For adults, athletes serve as emotional icons to be admired and respected for their skill and talent. Why else would grown men and women walk around in jerseys bearing their favorite athlete’s name?
Professional sports is a business, and it comes with a brand promise. The brand is what the athlete stands for to the consumer (the fan); the promise is that the athlete’s behavior will stay true to the brand. When a hamburger advertised as “juicy” tastes like shoe leather, the brand promise is broken. Consumers react by staying away from the offending burger joint. Similarly, when an admired athlete acts like a menace, the fans react the same way as they do to the tasteless hamburger. In fact, according to a poll conducted by the Sports Business Journal and Turnkey Sports, forty-four percent of avid fans said poor athlete behavior would cause them to buy fewer tickets to team events.
It seems we not only have an issue of misbehavior, we have a brand problem in professional sports.
In the end, who are the real victims of this brand problem? Not the fans, because they’ll find a new role model (inside or, heaven forbid, outside of sports). Not the sports leagues and teams, because they can change their brand behavior by switching brands (i.e. firing the offending athlete). The real victims are the athletes themselves.
So, what should be done?
Many sports organizations go on the offensive and start a marketing/PR campaign to change the perception of athlete behavior. I’ve just seen one kick off in my hometown, as the Indiana Pacers rebuild an image tarnished by off-the-court player behavior. However, while these campaigns are appropriate responses, they have limited prospects for success. After all, if brands are behavior, trying to change the perception of misbehavior is a lot harder than simply behaving properly. PR campaigns assume that fans don’t know the difference between perception and reality. News-flash: they do.
So, again, what should be done?
First, athletes must take responsibility for their behavior and recognize that behavior has consequences, good or bad. If they’re not savvy enough to understand the social reasons for proper business behavior (and they are a business once they put the team uniform on), they should recognize the harm they’re doing to their own marketability. Pocket book issues get everyone’s attention. I’ve known many sports sponsorship managers in companies and ad agencies. And, I’m having a hard time imagining them justifying a relationship with a misbehaving athlete to their boss or their shareholders. It’s much easier to simply cut and run from the athlete.
Second, we should develop better support structures for athletes. Properly structured and funded career counseling, stress management, and substance abuse programs are a few examples. In certain teams and leagues, we are seeing more and more of these programs offered by player development personnel. This is a positive trend and should be encouraged throughout sports.
Third, there need to be greater sanctions levied by sponsors, teams, and leagues. Sponsorship morals clauses need to be tighter. Sanctions for misbehavior need to have sharper teeth to them. (It seems the NFL has already taken the lead in tightening its conduct policy.) And, there should be closer cooperation between players associations and leagues. After all, all sports business professionals are concerned with the commercial viability and success of professional sports and its athletes. If a few athletes can’t understand the connection between their behavior and commercial success, they have no place in a business which rewards them so handsomely.
Maybe someday soon, we’ll pick up the paper and find three athletes featured on the front page, whose brands are associated with talent, courage, and spirit, respectively. However, if the industry and its athletes don’t face up to our collective responsibilities to our customers, we’ll continue to experience a daily dose of bad news along with our morning coffee.
Posted by Ken Ungar