Archive for February, 2010

Tiger Woods Continuing To Do It “My Way”

Saturday, February 20th, 2010

We advise athletes in crisis-mode to heed three simple rules to manage their PR:

  1. Tell it all. Don’t let the media enjoy the drip…drip….drip… of disclosing new details by the hour or the day.
  2. Tell the truth. A lie will haunt you forever.
  3. Tell it fast. You have three to twenty-four hours to get your story out before the media vacuum is filled with garbage generated by your detractors.

Until yesterday, Tiger Woods ignored all three rules.

So, during his 14 minute statement, what lessons can we discern that he learned?

Did he tell it all?  Yes.  He shared with us as much detail as we had the right to know.  Yes, he did have affairs.  No, Elin did not hit him.  Yes, he is seeking help for himself and his marriage.  Yes, he is taking complete responsibility for his behavior.

Awesome.  Put a check mark by rule number 1.

Did he tell the truth?  We think so.  However, the staged and overly controlled nature of his statement left us scratching our heads.  He addressed a room full of supporters (friends, family, and staff….but no Elin).  No questions from the media.   It left many with the impression that he still had something to hide.

The text of his statement felt too complicated.  Isn’t an apology supposed to be simple?  I was unsure if his statement was written by a speech-writer or written from the heart.  I suspect the latter, since it rambled and contained an odd combination of apology and overt attempts to elicit sympathy (i.e.,why did an apology include the details of his foundations’ work?).

And, then there was the tone of his statement.  Why did he feel the need to lash out at the media?  (The same media he wouldn’t face in the room.)  He raised his voice several times to scold nameless accusers and the paparazzi.  It sounded like a boss yelling at a subordinate he doesn’t respect.  Is this an environment encouraging a cynical audience to believe him?  Not really.  The combination of contrition and accusation muted the intended effect:  “I’m simply sorry.”

Well, at least he got the facts out….finally.  Put a check minus by rule number 2.

Did he tell it fast?  We know the answer here.  83 days.  Now, this story has a life of its own no matter what he does or says.

Put an X by rule number 3.

Perhaps the most troubling aspect of this media saga is Tiger’s attitude towards the repair of his brand.  There’s no doubt that he’s surrounded by a highly competent team of advisors, who can help minimize the current and future damage to Brand Tiger.  However, I suspect that Tiger believes his brand is too important or powerful to play by the PR rules that every celebrity must recognize (just ask President Clinton).   Only time will tell whether Tiger will succeed in reforming a brand by managing his PR “the Tiger way.”

Posted by Ken Ungar

A Lesson in Professional Responsibility

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

When you think professional responsibility in sports, what do you think of? I think of charity work, good sportsmanship, media appearances and signing autographs for fans.

And, in light of recent gun-toting events in the NBA, I hate to say it, but Gilbert Arenas and Javaris Crittenton either have an extremely tainted view of professional responsibility, or they just flat out have none whatsoever.

Arenas and Crittenton, teammates on the Washington Wizards, were suspended this Wednesday for bringing firearms to the locker room at the Verizon Center.  Apparently the two had gotten into a heated argument over a card game on a flight home from an away game, which continued over to the locker room where the two came packin’ heat.

David Stern, the NBA Commissioner, took firm action after completing a full investigation of the two players, and suspended them without pay for the rest of the season (Arenas will lose $9.9 million of his $16.2 million salary this year, and Crittenden will lose $686,000 of his $1.48 million salary) – the 3rd and 4th longest suspensions in NBA history.

There are explicit rules in the NBA and unwritten rules that are commonly understood in sports that players must follow, and Stern made an example of Arenas and Crittenton, proving that in order to participate, players must uphold a certain level of professionalism.

Let this be a lesson to you athletes out there – think of the locker room, the court or field, or really anywhere you go as your office.  It is just like any other job – you need to carry yourself as a professional because you are one; but unlike other jobs, you are on the clock 24-7, 365.  If you choose to act otherwise, there are consequences – you could be fined, suspended, arrested or worse.

We teach our clients that brands are about behavior.  In order to have a marketable brand, athletes must act in a professional manner that represents both their personal brand and the image of their organization in a positive light.  Every touch point is an opportunity to either reinforce or detract from your established brand.

Choose wisely.

The Death of Athlete Endorsements? Not Quite.

Monday, February 1st, 2010

Now, They're Lovin' LeBron, Too!

Since last November when Tiger became a “Cheetah,”  sports marketing pundits ran over each other in the rush to proclaim “the death of athlete endorsements.”  Tiger Woods killed them all, right?

“Radioactive.”  “Undependable.”  “Too risky.”

Baloney!

The celebrity endorsement industry is over 100 years old.  One philandering athlete …. even of the status of Tiger Woods …. is not going to nullify the marketing value of endorsements.   And, today comes the news that McDonald’s has retained the services of LeBron James for a multi-year, multi-million dollar, multi-faceted series of sports marketing promotions.  Bravo, McDonald’s.  Congrats, LeBron.  It seems this segment of the industry is indeed alive and well.

Will endorsing companies do better due diligence about their athlete’s character?  Sure.

Will endorsing companies negotiate stronger morals clauses?  No doubt.

Will endorsing companies hesitate before committing to long term arrangements, especially those involving investment in licensed products with long shelf lives?  Yep.

As well they should.

However, even in the aftermath of Tiger, life in the athlete endorsements industry moves on.

Posted by Ken Ungar.